About Sally Burns

My academic background is in psychology and mental health. I am also a qualified and registered mental health nurse. Having built my own house a few years ago I became very interested in how aspects of our homes can promote or damage our health. I then trained as an accredited Feng Shui Practitioner (with the Feng Shui Academy) and have a special interest in electromagnetic radiation and its effects on human health.

Mobile phones for children…the perfect Christmas gift?

Image

Shops and online businesses are gearing up for the Christmas rush now, with wireless devices likely to be amongst the highest selling gift products.  But how appropriate are they for children?  When was the last time you read the small print enclosed in the box with a new mobile phone?  I’m not sure I ever have.  So, just for a change, take sometime to scrutinise that small print – it makes for fascinating reading.

The Wireless Association, CTIA, reminds us that the “industry has not said once that radio frequency microwave radiation is safe”.  And this is why the small print advises of “safe distances” of typically an inch for mobile phones to be held away from the head when in use, and “safe storage” when not in use.  We are not talking about in pockets close to reproductive organs or tucked inside bras.  Safe storage requires a greater distance from the body with the battery and antenna side facing away from it.

When it comes to purchasing gifts for children we would be well reminded that the UK Department of Health states that “children and young people under 16 should be encouraged to use mobile phones for essential purposes only”.  Why is this?

Girl Talking On Mobile Phone

Children are more vulnerable to electromagnetic radiation with a five-year old absorbing approximately 60% more microwave radiation than an adult.  This is because their skulls are thinner, their brains contain a higher water content, their heads are smaller, their nervous systems are still developing, their reproductive organs are developing and they have a longer time (lifespan) for latent effects to manifest.  Brain tumours have now overtaken leukaemia as the leading cause of non-accidental death in children.  Consultants report a 5-10% annual rise in paediatric tumours but survival rates from brain tumours has not shown any improvement in the last forty years.

So what gift will you choose for your children?  The chance of a long, happy and healthy life or the latest smartphone?

 

 

Autism …. a 21st century epidemic?

The rise and fall of the prevalence of various disorders and diseases is always an interesting thing to observe, as is an interrogation of the underlying causes.  A number of conditions have been on the increase in recent years and these have raised questions about the underlying cause, something which is not always obvious.

The statistics make for alarming reading.  In the 1920s,  the reported incidence of autism was 1 in 30,000.  By the 80s, this had risen to 1 in 500.  In 2000 the incidence was reported as approximately 1 in 325.  Today it is more than 1 in 50.

Autism Word Cloud Concept In Red Caps

Of course, much more is known today about this disorder which is likely to have resulted in better, more effective diagnosis.  There is greater public awareness and education too.  But many experts are linking the dramatic rise in incidence with the increasing use of electronic gadgets in our environment.  Establishing a definitive causal link makes for challenging research but there is enough evidence for many to conclude that we are in the midst of an epidemic of disease caused by the proliferation of EMFs.

Smart meters ….. hardly!

There has been a lot in the press this week about the national roll out of smart meters to monitor energy consumption in our homes, the most recent article being just yesterday in The Telegraph.   There is a doubt that they will do this effectively, if at all, but what they are will do however is make somebody very rich and add further to the load of electromagnetic fields circulating about our homes, in turn risking occupants health.

I am talking about the wireless type of smart meter of course, which will the default type offered to homes.  There are two alternatives though: one is to have a wired-in version, the other is not to have one at all.

Personally, I can think of better things to do with my time than fiddle about on a miniature screen in order to save the odd kilowatt here or there.  In my own household the principle of turning things off when not in use, wearing an extra jumper in order to turn down the heating, and boiling just enough water in the kettle to make the desired quantity of hot drink works well enough.  There is a wealth of action we can take to reduce our bills and they are well known, tried and tested. Saving energy, is not really a scientific conundrum, just common sense.  And it doesn’t require another wireless gadget to achieve it.

 

 

i-beacons and barges

News this month of the deployment of the so-called i-beacons in the British high street filled me with dread.  Pumping out Bluetooth signals to anyone going about the apparently harmless business of shopping, this just represents yet another increase to the already heavy toxic burden of electromagnetic radiation in public places.  Anyone who is electrosensitive will know that the high street is an already difficult place to be: this new technological facility is likely to make it an impossibly hostile place to go.

But it’s not just the electrosensitives amongst us that are going to be affected.  The continual bombardment of electromagnetic pulses will have an effect on everyone but it’s only electrosensitives who feel the effects.  And it emphasises the importance for everyone of having healthy home environments, particularly in the bedroom overnight, so that our bodies can properly and completely rest and repair.  Without this, sleep will be compromised, the immune system will suffer and ill health can find an easier door in.  Is it worth the risk?  If you do nothing else, switch off mobile and cordless phones at night, WiFi and laptops, don’t have things on charge near the bed and switch off and unplug anything electrical near the bed.  If you are concerned about neighbours or local masts or pylons, then have a survey.

So shopping is probably out as a form of entertainment for sufferers of electrosensitivity but what’s left that is electromagnetically benign.  You’d probably be surprised just how tricky it is finding options for entertainment that are .

The idea of a peaceful trip in a horse-drawn barge along my local canal seemed to offer a perfect opportunity for just such entertainment.  Surely I would not be in a sea of electromagnetic pollution floating along a canal in an historic barge.  I boarded the barge with my family and took my seat up front.  Ten minutes into the trip I feel the onset of my typical ES symptoms – nausea and the physical sensations of panic attack, a very odd feeling when mentally it is not possible to be more relaxed.  Surely not here.  Surely there is no WiFi or Bluetooth on the barge.  I know there are no masts around so it’s not that.  Meter in hand I detect the familiar pulses of mobile, Bluetooth and WiFi, made all the more strong because we are in an area with a poor signal and this makes devices turn up their power.

There is a chance for me to get off the barge at the half way point and I take it, to enjoy a peaceful and EMF free walk back along the tow path.  A far more pleasurable experience than being on a barge full of people moaning about their phones not having a signal and patently not appreciating the unique peace and beauty of a near-silent boat ride.

Yes I am middle-aged, electrosensitive and biased towards activities of a mindful nature.  But surely there is a time and place for everything, isn’t there?

Melatonin matters

June sees the longest day of the year, and of course the shortest nights.  Many of us now understand the importance of a dark bedroom in order to sleep well and switch on production of the vital health-promoting hormone, melatonin.  What may not be known, however, is that the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has in fact categorised ‘disruption by light at night’ as a “Class 2A probable carcinogen”. The benefits of using blackout blinds during the summer months, or if your bedroom is illuminated by street or other outside lighting, goes way beyond a good night’s sleep.

But light is just one element of the electromagnetic spectrum and melatonin production is also disrupted by exposure to other EMFs.  For example, use of a hairdryer after about 6pm all but switches off melatonin production for that night.  This is due to the very high electromagnetic fields associated with the motor.  Likewise, use of a computer, tablet, cordless or mobile phone etc. in the hour or so before you go to bed, can have the same effect.  If you have a DECT or mobile phone next to the bed, pulsing radiation into your bedroom, melatonin production will be severely disrupted.

Items on a bedside table.

Sleep disturbance is one of the most widely reported symptoms of electromagnetic sensitivity.  If you are experiencing sleep disturbance it makes sense to rule out electromagnetic pollution as a possible cause, alongside more mainstream investigations from a GP.  It is surely preferable to relocate devices and/or switch equipment off, than to resort to a course of sleeping pills.

Getting back a healthy balance of good quality sleep at night and energised activity during the day will have knock-on benefits to other areas of life.                         Is that bedtime ‘surf’ or night-time text really that important?

Dementia week … and EMFs

With the month of May hosting ‘dementia week’, it’s timely to consider to what extent our own behaviour may be contributing to the alarming increase in dementia and other neurological disorders.  Research conducted just last year at Bournemouth University by Professor of Psychiatric Social Work, Colin Pritchard, concluded that modern life is causing dementia at a younger age.

Appearing in the journal Public Health in May 2013, and reported in The Telegraph, the findings describe the sharp rise in deaths from dementia and other neurological disorders, in adults under 74, as an “epidemic”.  Between 1979 and 2010, of the ten biggest Western countries the USA had the largest increase in neurological deaths and the UK, the fourth largest in this age group.

Research like this is talking about you and me.  And our siblings, parents, partners, friends and children.  Isn’t it time to face up to the undeniable facts that our modern way of life is having a detrimental effect on our health?

Professor Pritchard was quoted as saying “considering the changes over the last 30 years – the explosion in electronic devices, rises in background non-ionising radiation – PCs, microwaves, TVs, mobile phones; road and air transport up four-fold increasing background petro-chemical pollution; chemical additives to food, et cetera.  There is no one factor rather the likely interaction between all these environmental triggers”.

Think about it.  Does that seem like a coincidence to you?  But there is action you can take to help yourself and now would be a good time to start.

Access the full Telegraph article here: www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10052486/Modern-life-causing-dementia-earlier-study-finds.html

 

Public awareness … or lack of it

We distributed a short survey at the National Self-Build and Renovation Centre “Ask an Architect” event in Swindon this weekend.  The findings were both interesting and rather alarming, suggesting a distinct lack of public awareness about the health hazards associated with EMFs.

One question gave a list of things which may be associated with harm to human health and respondents were asked to tick all those which they associated with such harm.    Only one respondent seemed aware that wireless technology and devices could lead to poor health and yet at the recent conference this year, given by the British Society for Ecological Medicine (BSEM), scientists there stated that the issue of electromagnetic radiation was set to be a bigger health risk to the public than smoking.

wireless devices in common use today

If you are on this website, you are one of a sadly small minority beginning to be educated about this issue so keep reading.  There is a growing body of evidence which backs up the position of the BSEM and yet most of us are still living in ignorance.